Assessing the impact of wastewater treatment works effluent on downstream water quality.

The impact of wastewater treatment works (WwTW) effluent on downstream river water quality is of increasing concern, particularly owing to the presence in effluents of a range of trace substances. In the case of contamination by metals the question of bioavailability has recently been accounted for in setting water quality standards for several metals. In the UK over the past decade the Chemical Investigations Programme (CIP) has generated upstream and downstream river quality data as well as associated WwTW effluent monitoring for over 600 sites, for the main contaminants of regulatory interest under the Water Framework Directive. Data presented here show that at a local level WwTW discharges have little impact for many contaminants. Soluble reactive phosphorus, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), cypermethrin, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) have been shown to be the principal substances where downstream concentrations were at least 10 % larger than the upstream value. Otherwise, poor compliance with riverine water quality standards tends to be associated with contamination at the river catchment scale, with corresponding implications for the nature of remedial actions that are likely to be successful. Compliance with water quality criteria for metals, taking account of bioavailability, is high overall.

Summary of data from the UKWIR chemical investigations programme and a comparison of data from the past ten years' monitoring of effluent quality.

This paper reports summary data from a ten-year programme of investigation into the composition of wastewater treatment works' effluents in the UK. The so-called Chemical Investigations Programme focused on determinands of regulatory importance and involved monitoring of effluents for over seventy trace substances and sanitary determinands at more than 600 UK treatment works sites. The results provide a definitive overview of effluent quality. Although raw data are available, this publication of summary data provides a convenient résumé of the current state of knowledge. An analysis of changes in concentrations over the monitoring period between 2010 and 2020 shows that for several substances (nickel, diethylhexylphthalate, nonylphenol, tributyltin, the brominated diphenyl ethers and triclosan) significant reductions in wastewater concentration have occurred over the period of interest, these are likely to have resulted from a combination of tighter regulatory controls and/or improved wastewater treatment.

Perfluorinated alkyl substances: Sewage treatment and implications for receiving waters.

This study comprises a detailed analysis of data for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) for over 600 wastewater treatment works effluents (WwTW) as well as samples upstream and downstream of each discharge of effluent into its receiving water. This has allowed an investigation of not only the effectiveness of removal of the perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) compounds during wastewater treatment but also implications for compliance with the environmental quality standard (EQS) set for PFOS under the Water Framework Directive. It is shown that effluents contain concentrations of PFOS that exceed the annual average EQS by a factor between 1.1-fold and 40-fold. The corresponding factors for PFOA are between 2-fold and 22-fold. The presence of high concentrations upstream, means that between a quarter and a third of individual effluents are found to reduce the concentration of fluorocarbons in the river downstream of the discharge point. The elevated concentrations upstream of the studied wastewater treatment works suggest inputs of these perfluoro compounds into the aquatic environment are ubiquitous and therefore difficult to address from simply setting permit conditions for individual WwTW. The freshwater EQS set for PFOS is based on several worst-case accumulation coefficients and large safety factors, which, when combined, result in a sub ng/L EQS. Consequently, the use of the biota derived quality standard may be a more realistic measure of environmental risk. It may be prudent, to assess the effectiveness of controls implemented in the last few years before considering widespread end-of-pipe treatment.

Effects of iron dosing used for phosphorus removal at wastewater treatment works; impacts on forms of phosphorus discharged and secondary effects on concentrations and fate of other contaminants.

Iron dosing for phosphorus reduction during wastewater treatment is wide practised across the globe. However, the impacts of this dosing in terms of the speciation of phosphorus discharged and secondary effects on removing or introducing other trace elements from or into the effluent have not been studied. Results are presented for concentrations of a range of contaminants in over 600 wastewater treatment works, reported as mean concentration values derived from 20 effluent samples taken over a period of two years. Approximately half of the treatment works employed iron dosing to reduce concentrations of phosphorus in effluents. In addition to the expected effects on level of phosphorus discharged to surface waters, it is shown that these measures are shown to have unintended and beneficial consequences for concentrations of several other constituents of wastewater. Reductions of more than 40% in the concentrations of dissolved metals (copper, lead) benzo(a)pyrene and hexabromocyclododecane are observed. Lower but still significant decreases in concentration (>30%) are evident for dissolved cadmium, fluoranthene cypermethrin and biochemical oxygen demand. Small but less environmentally important increases are seen for iron and nickel, in the case of the latter this is presumably because nickel is a contaminant of the iron reagent used for dosing. These reductions are shown to offer significant benefits in terms of levels entering surface waters relating to the in-river environmental quality standards.

Seasonal variation of contaminant concentrations in wastewater treatment works effluents and river waters.

Results are presented for 170 wastewater treatment works sites (20 per substance in influent, effluent and 36 per substance in river water upstream and downstream of the WwTW discharge) over a period of two years between 2015 and 2017; this comprises data for approximately 3000 samples for effluent and 6000 for river samples taken downstream of effluent discharges. Seasonal trends in contaminant concentrations for several substances are reported. Two clear patterns of seasonal variation are proposed over and above all of the variables associated with environmental data including process technology, dilution and geography. Firstly, variation of riverine concentrations caused by seasonal fluctuations in river flow (sewage flow being relatively consistent) resulting in summer maxima and winter minima. Alternatively, variation is observed that is attributable to the improved performance of wastewater treatment processes under warmer conditions. This leads to the lowest concentrations in autumn when surface water/sewage treatment temperatures tend to peak. Seasonality for trace contaminants is more difficult to characterise than that of sanitary parameters owing to the higher variability in the concentration of the substances of interest. The data also provide an insight into the amplitude of such variations. This makes it possible to assess the likely effects of seasonality and its impact on aquatic life. For example, the existence of seasonality (perhaps due only to dilution effects) might be demonstrated, but the amplitude might be too small in relation to the potential ecotoxicological effects to be of any consequence.

The impact of tertiary wastewater treatment on copper and zinc complexation.

Tightening quality standards for European waters has seen a move towards enhanced wastewater treatment technologies such as granulated organic carbon treatment and ozonation. Although these technologies are likely to be successful in degrading certain micro-organic contaminants, these may also destroy compounds which would otherwise complex and render metals significantly less toxic. This study examined the impact of enhanced tertiary treatment on the capacity of organic compounds within sewage effluents to complex copper and zinc. The data show that granulated organic carbon treatment removes a dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction that is unimportant to complexation such that no detrimental impact on complexation or metal bioavailability is likely to occur from this treatment type. High concentrations of ozone (>1 mg O3/mg DOC) are, however, likely to impact the complexation capacity for copper although this is unlikely to be important at the concentrations of copper typically found in effluent discharges or in rivers. Ozone treatment did not affect zinc complexation capacity. The complexation profiles of the sewage effluents show these to contain a category of non-humic ligand that appears unaffected by tertiary treatment and which displays a high affinity for zinc, suggesting these may substantially reduce the bioavailability of zinc in effluent discharges. The implication is that traditional metal bioavailability assessment approaches such as the biotic ligand model may overestimate zinc bioavailability in sewage effluents and effluent-impacted waters.

The effect of advanced treatment of sewage effluents on metal speciation and (bio)availability.

The bioavailability of metals can be strongly influenced by dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Wastewater treatment effluents add considerable quantities of DOC and metals to receiving waters, and as effluent controls become more stringent advanced effluent treatments may be needed. We assessed the effects of two types of advanced treatment processes on metal availability in wastewater effluents. Trace metal availability was assessed using diffuse gradients in thin films and predicted through speciation modelling. The results show little difference in metal availability post-advanced treatment. EDTA-like compounds are important metal complexants in the effluents.